Print Story Spectrum Is Green
Diary
By TheophileEscargot (Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 01:44:30 PM EST) (all tags)
Watching. Consumerism: coffee, dumb-bells, energy-saving light bulbs. Web.

Multipoll: your home?



What I'm Watching
A couple of new skiffy-ish series' out on UK TV. "Life on Mars" has a modern detective mysteriously sent back to the 1970s. Like the concept, and the sets and costumes are spookily accurate if a bit over-the-top: most people didn't dress to the extremes of fashion. The rest didn't quite click with me though: way too much tormented "I don't believe it" from the protagonist, other cop seemed a bit like a sketch-show pisstake of "The Sweeney", and the reactions of the other characters to the seemingly insane hero didn't seem extreme enough.

Have always found pilot episodes to be a bit shit though, so will probably watch another to see if it settles down.

Also saw the first episode of new SF comedy Hyperdrive. Mildly amusing. Didn't seem too Red Dwarfish: seems more like The Office In Space as opposed to The Young Ones in Space. Its satirical targets are already pretty battered though. Not sure if it'll work for viewers: the slapstick might appeal to the teens, but I assume they're oblivious to jibes about the ambience of meeting rooms.

Consumerism
Coffee
Went for the cafetière not the fancy coffee machine after much agonizing. Hurts like a punch to the gut to turn down a cool gadget, but seems a bit defeatist as regards cutting down caffeine. I suppose cafetières aren't too bad for one cup: they're just fiddlier to clean since you can't just lift out the paper. You also more or less have to use boiling water rather than 90 degree water (or whatever it is), but doubt I could tell the difference anyway, and I haven't bothered with home grinding for a while.

Dumb-bells
Have reached the point of using all the weights on my dumb-bell set again (20kg altogether) for some exercises, so I bought another four 5kg plates at Argos. This lot wasn't so hard to get home: they stayed in a compact box, rather than falling through their own packaging. Took a cab rather than the Tube though: I think carrying them in the box would have done my back in. Had an elaborate plan to wrap them in towels to spread the load and use a rucksack, but decided that was too much of a pain. Also got some weightlifting gloves which was probably a bad buy: they seem a little loose on me, and God knows how you clean leather/neoprene.

Mildly annoyed by the way Argos have taken the indexes off their in-store catalogues (at least as far as I can see). You now have to find the right section and leaf through, presumably to encourage you to impulse buy, which is a pain if you know what you want from the Internet. (USian note: Argos are a catalog shop with a small front area and a big warehouse behind: you pick out what you want from the catalog, pay a person or human, then pick it up from the counter about 10 minutes later. Or buy direct from the catalog and get stuff delivered.)

Light bulbs
Am trying out the energy-saving light bulbs. Have been somewhat suspicious of them, since they're supposedly a brilliant idea (11W bulb generates as much light as a 60W filament bulb, bulbs cost £1.50 in Morrisons) but nobody ever uses them.

Tried one out in the bathroom and it seemed OK. Spectrum seems a bit whiter than a normal bulb: it's basically just a smaller fluorescent tube. That might bug some people. Didn't flicker. Takes a few seconds to reach maximum brightness, which to me is a feature not a bug: not keen on being dazzled in the morning.

Switched the rest of the flat over today, and I'm finding the closest one to me is flickering distractingly on occasion Stays stable for an hour, then flickers for ten minutes or so. Swapped it with the bathroom one, and that bulb flickers in the same way when I put it in the same socket. Kitchen one seems fine though.

Recommendation: if you're thinking of switching over, buy one bulb and try it out in several rooms, or you might find you've wasted your money because it flickers in some or all sockets.

Food Diary
Friday
Late Breakfast: Pastrami and gherkin bagel. 2 cups tea.
Lunch: Stilton and vegetable soup.
Supper: 2 big slices toast, Tesco Chunky Chilli meal soup, (230 kcal, 20g protein), piece of Camembert, 1 slice ham, apple.
Booze: 2 pints lager
Snacks: 2 Multigrain Rye Ryvita with Worcestershire sauce (37 kcal per slice).
Cocodirect drinking chocolate with skimmed milk.
Exercise: 3.5 miles walking, 5BX Chart 2 level B+

Saturday so far
Brunch: 2 boiled eggs, toast.
Dinner: Marks and Spencer's "Count on Us" Thai Red Chicken and Noodles ready meal (340 kcal), 2 huge slices of fresh bread. Onken Chocolate and Hazelnut mousse (171 kcal).

Web
IO Brush: Art revolution or cool but brief gimmick?

Stolen from Metafilter: the Draw Batgirl bandwagon.

< A moment of silence. | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Spectrum Is Green | 47 comments (47 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Couple of things by Herring (4.00 / 2) #1 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 02:16:23 PM EST
I am switching the house over the energy saving bulbs as and when the old ones blow. I haven't had any flickering trouble with then and none has failed so far (some are at least 5 years old). I have a dimmer on the spotlights in the kitchen though so wont be replacing those. The colour/tone is different but then there's always lampshades.

s/indexes/indices. Next time you're in Argos, you may want to explain this to the staff.

You can't outlaw rabbits! They'll just go underground - Milton Jones


I think you mean by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #2 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 02:28:54 PM EST
Or by Herring (4.00 / 1) #4 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 02:59:26 PM EST
there's always a lampshade

OK. That was bound to happen. I didn't have my Weetabices this morning.

You can't outlaw rabbits! They'll just go underground - Milton Jones
[ Parent ]

Cafetiere temperature by gpig (4.00 / 1) #3 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 02:29:21 PM EST
Wait until the water in the kettle stops bubbling, then pour.
---
(,   ,') -- eep
"This option is deprecated, as it is conceptually flawed." -- man psql


kg? by spacejack (4.00 / 1) #5 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 03:12:05 PM EST
I thought you guys would use pounds. Or stones.

I have some solid state dumbbells. It's tricky getting  back into shape with them when I slack off, but I do like them.

Re: Batgirl - there are a surprising number of good drawings and styles in there.



I think it's because by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #10 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 03:29:27 AM EST
It's theoretically a sports thing: people tend to use international measures for that sort of thing.

Things are actually fairly metric here: our beloved European Union overlords insist everything is labelled and sold primarily in metric. They got an exception for pints of beer, but otherwise it's actually illegal to sell somone a pound of potatoes for instance, and people have been prosecuted for this heinous crime.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

To be fair to the EU.... by Tonatiuh (2.00 / 0) #17 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 03:44:09 PM EST
... the UK laws about the metric system predate the EU by 70 or 80 years.

This goes back to the late XIX century when France wanted both the metric system and the meridian zero (to go through Paris, naturalment) to rule us all.

A compromise was reached: Brits could keep the dirty meridian but the metric system would be used.

UKia even enacted the laws under which traders are prosecuted but the prosecution was, how can I put it?, enforced with no much enthusiasm.

I guess their calculation was, being the biggest empire back then, that the only thing they needed was the meridian, the metric system would never catch on. They were right about the meridian, all the income the UK obtains from tourists visiting the Royal Observatory is the best con  in London, people goes there pretty much to take pictures of themselves in top of an imaginary line.

They were wrong about the metric system, but nobody is perfect. Only a few barbaric nations still use the Imperial or English system nowadays and some other remain to be fully civilised, but we, the metric missionaries on these places, keep at our task.

The day will come when we ask a quarter of a kilo of something on these places and we are served promptly with an all knowing smile.

[ Parent ]

I object to that by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #18 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 04:13:07 PM EST
There are far, far, better tourist cons in London. The Greenwich Observatory and the Maritime Museum are free to enter FFS. What about Somerset House? That's brilliant: buy three different tickets for different "museums" in the same building, to see stuff that's inferior to that in the free museums. Not even to mention Madame Tussauds or the London Dungeon. Pah.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

I'm glad to say I wasn't conned by garlic (2.00 / 0) #46 Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 12:59:24 PM EST
We went to neither the wax museum (woo hoo! that's a statue of a famous person! I'm glad I paid 20 pounds for this!) or the london dungeon (which I don't think anyone saw any info on in the US) while there.

[ Parent ]

Don't be conned, ask the locals. by Tonatiuh (2.00 / 0) #47 Tue Jan 31, 2006 at 05:00:30 PM EST
If you wander in front of Madame Tussauds around half hour before they close, specially during low tourist season, weekdays or a day that is both, you get the people working there begging you into the place for one third or fourth of the original price.

[ Parent ]

Dumbells by gazbo (4.00 / 2) #6 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 05:03:58 PM EST
What the hell are you doing that 20kg isn't enough?  My dumbells (which admittedly I don't use that much these days, the twice-weekly climbing being sufficient) have 10kg on each, and that's plenty for an anaerobic exercise.

Unless you're fully body-building (rather than just going for strength and tone) 4 sets of 30 bicep curls with 10kg on each dumbell is more than enough.

What the hell are you planning to do with 20kg on each?!


"Engarde!" cried the larvae, huskily. - Scrymarch



Oh, and speed: by gazbo (4.00 / 1) #7 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 05:08:20 PM EST
If you're thinking 10kg is light to lift, you're probably doing it too fast.  Ecah curl should take 1-2 seconds.  Other exercises should be done at a similar rate - doing an action fast makes it far, far easier and gives far, far less benefit.

"Engarde!" cried the larvae, huskily. - Scrymarch

[ Parent ]

1-2 seconds is way too fast by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #9 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 03:20:29 AM EST
I aim for 10 seconds for a complete movement. I do 10 reps per set: this book's pretty helpful and recommends 8 - 12 reps per set.

The exercises I've reached 10kg per hand for are: lunges; shrugs; curls; bench-press; triceps extension. I may never use the full 20kg for some of those, but I need to progressively up the weight to keep gaining muscle. Even the full set would only be half my body weight though, so I might be able to bench it. You're presumably lifting your whole bodyweight while rockclimbing (which come to think of it is probably about half mine).

In conclusion. Beefcake! BEEFCAKE!
Beefcake! BEEFCAKE!
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

10 seconds for a curl? by gazbo (4.00 / 1) #11 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 04:42:39 AM EST
Obviously I meant the flex only, but 10 seconds?  Jesus, I'd get bored!

Maybe I'm getting confused.  I had a vague memory that you were roughly the same body size/shap as I am.  If not then it'll throw the relative weights off.

As fer reps, I prefer to do 20-30, but that's because I'm heading for stamina as well as just explosive power and muscle build.


"Engarde!" cried the larvae, huskily. - Scrymarch

[ Parent ]

Aaargh, this clearly needs more precision by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #12 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 05:15:53 AM EST
OK, I just did ten curls at my normal rate with the stopwatch on, and it came out at 56 seconds.

That averages out at... 5.6 seconds.

I thought I was doing it slower. Not sure now if I should slow down or speed up.

I am 5'10'' and 13st 8. Presumably would have been 14st4 at the last LHusi drinks.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

Timings by stark (4.00 / 2) #13 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 06:00:08 AM EST
I have been told that a good timing for weight-training is two seconds for lifting and four seconds for lowering the weight.

The theory is that the lowering movement can be more effective at building muscle than the raising movement.

Having said that, this was circa 1995 so the current thinking may be different. Also this was aimed at 12 reps / set, particularly for building muscle, not stamina.
--
U.S. Patent 5443036 concerns a device for encouraging a cat to exercise by chasing a light spot.
[ Parent ]

Bah to stamina by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 2) #14 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 06:22:28 AM EST
It's not what you do with it that counts, it's how big it is.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

Beware by Man (4.00 / 1) #21 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 06:45:07 PM EST
A lot of weightlifting advice assumes that you are mostly concerned with showy, defined muscles rather than actual strength and (as you say) stamina.

It all boils down to whether you want explosive bursts of strength or to be able to hold things for long periods of time.

[ Parent ]

What I would really like to tell my gym instructor by stark (4.00 / 1) #24 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 04:20:37 AM EST
Lester Burnham: I figured you guys might be able to give me some pointers. I need to shape up. Fast.

Jim Olmeyer: Are you just looking to lose weight, or do you want increased strength and flexibility as well?

Lester Burnham: I want to look good naked!
--
U.S. Patent 5443036 concerns a device for encouraging a cat to exercise by chasing a light spot.
[ Parent ]

I'd be too scared of the responses by R Mutt (4.00 / 1) #26 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 05:28:12 AM EST
"Yes, but we need to stick to the realm of the possible here."
"OK, strip!"
"Have you considered liposuction?"
"Branding and piercing is very hot in body modification this year."

[ Parent ]

Whichever is best by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #28 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 06:59:30 AM EST
For fighting Evil in all its loathesome forms.

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
[ Parent ]

You don't need muscles for that by Man (2.00 / 0) #36 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 11:16:09 AM EST
You need an uzi.

[ Parent ]

slow down or speed up by Man (4.00 / 1) #22 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 06:53:41 PM EST
Are you mostly concerned with looks (big muscles) and being able to move really massive things, or with never getting tired hauling around moderate loads?

[ Parent ]

Neither by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #23 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 01:40:58 AM EST
The main purpose is as an anti-yo-yo defence.

When you lose weight by dieting, you lose some muscle tissue as well as fat. That can lead to the dreaded yo-yo effect: you end up with less muscle and a slower metabolism, burning fewer calories per day. So as soon as you relax the diet, you balloon up again.

So, the purpose is just to avoid losing (or ideally gain) muscle mass, insofar as that's possible with a minimal effort.

The books say that "explosive strength" is a myth though. The only two variables are strength and fitness, neither of which I have any interest in per se.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

Which books? by Man (2.00 / 0) #37 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 11:18:10 AM EST
There are definitely different sorts of muscles. (Not that it matters if you don't care.)

[ Parent ]

Dude, you have SO drunk the Kool-aid ;-) by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #38 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 02:32:48 PM EST
The critical knowledge to remember is that fiber type is controlled by the motor nerve that innervates a fiber. Unless you change the nerve, you won't change fiber types from fast to slow or vice versa. Just this type of experiment has been performed in animals (generally rats). So, remember, there is no compelling evidence to show that human skeletal muscle switches fiber types from "fast" to "slow" due to training."
But I do admit it: if you're training for an endurance sport then high-reps and low-weights make sense for other reasons. It's not much use to me though.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

well by Man (2.00 / 0) #39 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 03:03:15 PM EST
Well, I guess that I should disbelieve the Scientific American article on the subject because some random norwegian saws otherwise. (I'd link, but they charge for old articles. I originally read it in the dead tree version.)

BTW: The Sci Am article, written after the think you linked to (which is ten years old) described the results of experiments where muscle samples were taken from athletes.

Seriously, I'm not sure what kool-aid I'm supposed to have drunk...

[ Parent ]

We have a mix of bulbs by georgeha (4.00 / 1) #8 Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 06:39:20 PM EST
some of our old ceiling globes just won't fit the compact flourescents, so I have to use incandescent. I do put CF in whenever I can, to save money and replacement time.

Plus, I have flourescent tubes in the kitchen and basement.

I have an old freeweight set in the attic, it must be about 20 stone or so. Nowadays, since I work out at I Y, I only use it when I need extra weight (winter driving, driveway tamping).




Energy saving bulbs by ambrosen (2.00 / 0) #15 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 07:37:33 AM EST
I've had a Morrison's one that was only happy in some sockets, but it's not been a problem with other sockets. Quite a few of the fittings in this house have dimmers and others are MR16 downlighters but I'm getting CFLs for the others. Dimmable tubes are available in the US and apparently AUia (at 240V) or in batches of 2000 from China. Would be nice to try them. Colour temperature is annoying.



you should have gone by martingale (2.00 / 0) #16 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 07:55:55 AM EST
for the stovetop espresso maker. Pour some water in the bottom half, caffè in the middle bit, and wait until it percolates into the top bit.

Pouring water into and out of a kettle is way too housewifeish...
--
$E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$


I don't like compact flourescent bulbs by lm (4.00 / 1) #19 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 04:21:14 PM EST
I've tried them out a few times. They never seem to last long enough to justify their price premium over incandescent bulbs, even if one counts energy saved. I don't mind the paler light so much. The length of time to full brightness that slowly increases over the life of the bulb can be irritating, though.

WRT the poll, you need an option for ``other'' on the weight lifting portion. You left out weight training equipment that uses tension rather than actual weights.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic


time to brightness & making them last longer by Dr H0ffm4n (2.00 / 0) #27 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 05:45:36 AM EST
They tend to break when they're being switched on.

Just do what I do. Leave them all turned on all the time.

[ Parent ]

There are places where I've tried that by lm (2.00 / 0) #30 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 07:07:32 AM EST
We've got one light in our basement that we leave on all of the time. Even in that socket, a compact fluorescent light barely lasts 3-4x as long as a typical incandescent light. To make up for the price premium it needs to last > 5x.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Maybe I'm miscalculating by R Mutt (2.00 / 0) #31 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 07:28:12 AM EST
Or your electricity is really cheap. But...

An electricity rate here is 8.24 pence per kwh.
Energy saving "60W" bulb takes 9W, saving 51W.
Over a day that's 1.224 kwh
Saves 10.09 pence per day.
Bulb costs 1.50 in Morrisons, so that pays for itself in 15 days, running full time.

[ Parent ]

Or his bulbs are expensive by Dr H0ffm4n (2.00 / 0) #32 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 08:09:36 AM EST
Market economics would make USian ecologically sound products more expensive.

[ Parent ]

Amazon.com seems to have them by R Mutt (2.00 / 0) #33 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 08:17:16 AM EST
At about 1.70. But maybe he would only be using the bulb it replaces for a couple of hours per day, which would stretch the time out a huge amount.

[ Parent ]

What do you know? the price has come down a bit! by lm (2.00 / 0) #35 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 09:18:04 AM EST
But Amazon prices are a tad misleading when the price is from a third party vendor that doesn't offer free shipping. The product you linked to has a shipping fee of $7.90, giving an end price of over $5 per bulb. I might be able to shave a dollar per bulb off by shopping locally and not incurring the shipping fee.

Now, if these bulbs did last the full 10000 hours that they are rated for, they certainly would be a good bargain. I suspect that the problem is at least in part the quality of our electric lines. Ohio has some of the dodgiest power lines in the US. I suspect that if the lines were cleaner and less prone to browning out and brief surges, the cf bulbs might last longer in my house.

Once I'm through my current crate full of incandescents, I might try buying a few CFs to see if they still fail to meet expectations.

But if I were really interested in saving power, I'd unplug the TV, Stereo, DVD Player and VCR when not in use. Modern versions of these items all can use more power when turned ``off'' than incandescent bulbs do when turned on.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Modern in the sense of 1980's by ambrosen (2.00 / 0) #42 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 03:08:22 PM EST
and incandescent bulbs in the sense of bright enough to light up the inside of a matchbox.

Unless there really is a difference between energy efficiency standards in the US and the EU.

[ Parent ]

how many bulbs run full time? by lm (2.00 / 0) #34 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 08:26:50 AM EST
I only have one light I never turn off and, to be honest, I've been to lazy to replace the bulb since the last time it burned out.

The last time I bought a compact flourescent light bulb, it cost the equivalent of four pounds vs. the equivalent of about twenty pence for an incandescent bulb.

Electric rates here in the US are less than 3 pence per kilowatt hour, meaning a bulb run continuously for 101 days would pay for itself in the US. But 100 days of run time for a light bulb is the equivalent of three to four years for most of the lamps in my house. I've yet to have a compact incandescent last longer than 2 years.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Electric rates are 3p/kWh? by ambrosen (2.00 / 0) #41 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 03:06:35 PM EST
Are you sure that's not the gas rates?

[ Parent ]

Electric averages 5 to 6 cents per kilowatt hour by lm (2.00 / 0) #43 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 04:10:07 PM EST
Unless my arithmetic is absolute pants, that converts to less than 3p.

Gas doesn't get measured in Kwh. I looked up the price before posting.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Ohio's cheap. by ambrosen (2.00 / 0) #45 Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 08:17:31 AM EST
That's just above wholesale price here.

Texas (.PDF, sorry) aims for about $0.15/kWh. We're at about £0.06/kWh, with gas at £.022/kWh, which is thought to be good. I guess you've got a lot of coal, and no one closed all the mines.

[ Parent ]

That's not true of compact fluorescents. by ambrosen (2.00 / 0) #40 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 03:05:49 PM EST
Especially ones with a soft start. And it definitely doesn't save electricity leaving them on all the time, despite the urban myth to that effect.

[ Parent ]

In my experience by Dr H0ffm4n (2.00 / 0) #44 Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 05:35:18 AM EST
They break at the moment they are switched on, just like normal incandescent bulbs, and obviously you don't have to wait for them to warm up if they are always on. I wasn't discussing saving electricity per se. But if there are lights that are always left on, it makes sense to use more efficient bulbs.

[ Parent ]

Clean leather/neoprene by thunderbee (4.00 / 1) #20 Sun Jan 15, 2006 at 06:16:24 PM EST
Washing machine, cold/30°C, as with your laundry. Beware of the possible Velcro straps though, they might damage delicate fabric.
Du not tumble dry.
Works for my sailing gloves, and they look just like weightlifting gloves despite the very different use.

As for FB, they worked in all sockets with no problem. Huge savings.



TV by nebbish (4.00 / 1) #25 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 05:12:22 AM EST
Those programmes are the highlights of the BBC's new season. Both are pretty crap, as was last night's "landmark" drama Friends and Crocodiles. Channel 4 is where it's at nowadays.

--------
It's political correctness gone mad!


"pay a person or human" by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #29 Mon Jan 16, 2006 at 07:03:27 AM EST
Well, quite.  The couple of times I've been in, the queues for the "person or human" tills were half way around the shop, while half the touchscreen payment points were on the fritz and nobody (bar irksome fiddling Yoof) were approaching the others.  FUTURE SHOCK!

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.


Spectrum Is Green | 47 comments (47 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback